Cases 11 - 20 of 1,474
HAYES v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2024cv03553
Plaintiff:
JORDAN DERRY HAYES
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
JORDAN v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03320
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART, INC., WALMART STORES EAST, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SCARPATO v. SMOKEY POINT DISTRIBUTING, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03236
Defendant:
KITE JORDAN, SMOKEY POINT DISTRIBUTING, LLC and JOHN DOE 1
Plaintiff:
ELAINE SCARPATO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SCHWARTZ v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
JORDAN TYLER SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JORDAN v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv07892
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC. and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
MONICA C. JORDAN
Unknown:
ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JORDAN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03129
Plaintiff:
MONICA JORDAN
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS, INC. v. LEVITT
as 3:2024cv07743
Respondent:
JORDAN LEVITT
Petitioner:
ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS, INC. v. LEVITT
as 2:2024cv07743
Respondent:
JORDAN LEVITT
Petitioner:
ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
JORDAN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01003
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
CINDY R. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
Stoddart v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2024cv02873
Plaintiff:
Jordan Stoddart
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
