Cases 11 - 20 of 22
ALLEN v. SCI CAMPHILL et al
as 2:2014cv04459
Petitioner:
GORDEN ALLEN
Respondent:
SCI CAMPHILL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ____________, LAUREL E. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellman v. Motter et al
as 3:2014cv01304
Plaintiff:
Brian Ellman
Defendant:
Warden Motter, Deputy Bechdel, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. Josephwicz et al
as 3:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Rivera
Defendant:
Bart Josephwicz, John Doe, Jerome Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDEN v. CAVALLARO et al
as 2:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH GORDEN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN J. CAVALLARO , JORDAN W. FELZER, DAVID APOTHAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SUTTON et al v. EXIGEN USA, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06267
Plaintiff:
MARTYN SUTTON and ALEXANDER VAN GORDEN
Defendant:
EXIGEN USA, INC., EXIGEN INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC., ALEC MILOSLAVSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CHASE v. GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2012cv00180
Petitioner:
WARREN CHASE
Respondent:
GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, LT. GOV. ANTHONY G. BROWN, SECRETARY STATE, JOSHUA SHATSTERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GORDEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2010cv00254
Plaintiff:
MARY JO GORDEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOYLEN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91376
Plaintiff:
GORDEN BOYLEN and LINDA BOYLEN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., EMPIRE ACE INSULATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GORDEN v. ASTRUE
as 2:2009cv04542
Plaintiff:
SCOTT L. GORDEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
