Cases 11 - 20 of 31
LEE v. CHECK AND CREDIT REPORTING, INC.
as 2:2014cv06130
Plaintiff:
LINDA LEE
Defendant:
CHECK AND CREDIT REPORTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BROWN v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv04775
Plaintiff:
LINDA LEE BROWN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TURNER et al v. GENERAL ELECTRONIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60141
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA TURNER , WILLIAM TURNER , LINDA LEE TURNER and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRONIC COMPANY, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED and CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Matthew P. Amos, et al v. Franklin Fin Ser Corp, et al
as 11-4528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW P. AMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN FIN SER CORP, LOWELL R. GATES, LINDA LEE GATES and others
MCDERMOTT v. MCDERMOTT
as 2:2011cv01369
Petitioner:
MARK EDWARD MCDERMOTT
Respondent:
LINDA LEE MCDERMOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE et al v. GAF CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66908
Plaintiff:
MALVIN H. LEE and LINDA LEE
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHORTLAND et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64903
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J SHORTLAND and LINDA LEE SHORTLAND
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTERMEYER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv01652
Plaintiff:
LINDA LEE WALTERMEYER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Amos v. Franklin Financial Services Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01285
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Amos, Christine A. Amos, Robert A. Abel and others
Defendant:
Franklin Financial Services Corporation, Lowell R. Gates, Linda Lee Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PHILLIPS v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as 2:2010cv64411
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE PHILLIPS and LINDA LEE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
