Cases 11 - 20 of 49
HER v. DONALD NUCKEL & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04581
Defendant:
MIYOUNG CHUNG, DONALD NUCKEL & CO., INC. and DONALD NUCKEL
Plaintiff:
NAM SU HER
NAM v. FOAMIX PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. et al
as 3:2020cv00670
Defendant:
FOAMIX PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., REX BRIGHT, STANLEY HIRSCH and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY NAM
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. SB HOSPITALITY PALM SPRINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06954
Defendant:
HANHE CHO, SB HOSPITALITY PALM SPRINGS, LLC and NAM MIN CHO
Plaintiff:
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIM v. BEAUTY TOWN INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv16972
Plaintiff:
YONG NAM LIM
Defendant:
DON PARK and BEAUTY TOWN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
LEE et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 2:2018cv08407
Plaintiff:
NAM YOUL LEE and JIN SOOK LEE
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and JOHN E. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ANYCLO INTERNATIONAL INC. v. CHA et al
as 3:2018cv05759
Plaintiff:
ANYCLO INTERNATIONAL INC.
Defendant:
YANG-SUP CHA, NAM-HEE KIM, STAFFORD CHA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Viet Nam Vets Motorcyle Club-PA et al v. Thomas Lightner, Legacy Vets Motorcycle Club-Pennsylvania-USA et al
as 1:2015cv01346
Plaintiff:
Viet Nam Vets Motorcyle Club-PA, L.Z. Independence and L.Z. Independence, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Lightner, Ron Tice, Blain Holden and others
Intervenor:
Viet Nam Vets-Legacy Vets Motorcycle Club-USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
ONG et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv06594
Plaintiff:
TINA ONG , HAN NAM ONG , ENUNG NJOMAN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAM v. NELKE
as 3:2016cv08632
Plaintiff:
SUNG BOK NAM
Defendant:
MARK D. NELKE, D.M.D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
