Cases 11 - 20 of 55
CALHOUN v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv02448
Plaintiff:
TIA RENEE CALHOUN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, DANIEL WHITE, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUPREY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
ALEX DUPREY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWEN v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06539
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWEN
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSI v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06540
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROSSI
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06538
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WELCH
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOSTIC et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv06479
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC BOSTIC , SHERRON HILL , DERRICK QUADENFIELD and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL et al v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06060
Plaintiff:
RHAHEAM HILL and ALEXIS SANTIAGO
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
BOBE et al v. SOTO et al
as 2:2015cv06014
Plaintiff:
IVONNE BOBE and LAURA MONTALVO
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. SOTO, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-25, POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTANA v. BETTS
as 2:2015cv04226
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN SANTANA
Defendant:
PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES et al v. SKILETZ et al
as 5:2015cv03906
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOLMES , JR. and DAVID SANTEE
Defendant:
WILLIAM FRANK SKILETZ, IV , JOSHUA DAVID BRUBAKER , KEVIN BIROSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
