Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Perez v. Bristol Excavating, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01512
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Bristol Excavating, Inc. and Calvin Bristol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRAUN v. PEREZ et al
as 3:2016cv03640
Plaintiff:
FERDINAND BRAUN
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, LEONARD J. HOWIE, III and RHOLANDA BASKNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Perez v. The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
as 4:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez et al v. Tarry Bratton, BC, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez , Secretary of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Tarry Bratton, BC, Inc. and BC, Inc., 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. ISLAND ORGANICS PROFIT SHARING PLAN et al
as 2:2016cv02346
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
ISLAND ORGANICS PROFIT SHARING PLAN and BANK OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. INTERACTIVE MARKETING GROUP INC. 401 (K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
as 2:2016cv01988
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
INTERACTIVE MARKETING GROUP INC. 401 (K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. VICTOR PAVING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00383
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
VICTOR PAVING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and VICTOR E. ZENI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. LAS MARGARITAS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LAS MARGARITAS, INC. , FELIPE PEREZ and VICTOR PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
URRUTIA Y URRUTIA et al v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2016cv01351
Plaintiff:
JUAN URRUTIA Y URRUTIA and ROMULO DE PAZ BRITO
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , PORTIA WU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
PEREZ v. LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01079
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. and WILLIAM P. LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
