Cases 11 - 20 of 29
DRUCKENMILLER v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv05354
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE DRUCKENMILLER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Blackburn v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Blackburn
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
KANE v. SUPERINTENDENT PITKIN et al
as 3:2011cv00141
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE KANE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT PITKIN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66467
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE HALL
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANSEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66468
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE HANSEN
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSEQUIST v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2011cv00119
Petitioner:
TERRI LEE ROSEQUIST
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX , MAUREEN SKERDA , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HIGGINS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02581
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE HIGGINS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ROSEQUIST v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2011cv01832
Petitioner:
TERRI LEE ROSEQUIST
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, MAUREEN SKERDA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. KAYE et al
as 5:2010cv03275
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE GRAHAM
Defendant:
DANIEL KAYE, LEWIS J. FARINA and JOSEPH MADENSPACHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
