Cases 21 - 28 of 28
DICKIE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70565
Plaintiff:
RODMAN L. DICKIE, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUART v. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv37704
Plaintiff:
RODMAN C. STUART
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ADKINS et al v. SOGLIUZZO, ESQ. et al
as 2:2009cv01123
Plaintiff:
JANE E. ADKINS and CHARLIE ADKINS
Defendant:
JOHN B. SOGLIUZZO, ESQ., THE ESTATE OF MARY T. GRIMLEY, DEUTSCHE BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bishop et al v. The Hershey Company et al
as 1:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
Judith Bishop, Judith Bishop, Judith Bishop and others
Defendant:
The Hershey Company, Hershey Canada Inc., Mars, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
INTEGRATED SERVICE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. RODMAN
as 2:2007cv03591
Plaintiff:
INTEGRATED SERVICE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
DENNIS M. RODMAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Laborers Welfare Fund of Delaware Local No. 199 et al v. Rodman Construction Company Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00490
Plaintiff:
Laborers Welfare Fund of Delaware Local No. 199, Laborers of Delaware Local Union No. 199 Pension Plan, Local 199 Laborers International Union of North America Annuity Plan and others
Defendant:
Rodman Construction Company Inc. and Healy Long & Jevin Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
RODMAN v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv64205
Plaintiff:
ALLEN RODMAN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP, GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
