Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 2.74 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.11 Acres, in Jackson Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel Number 074.00-2,005.00.000. et al
as 3:2014cv02444
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 2.74 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.11 Acres, in Jackson Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel Number 074.00-2,005.00.000., Edward Chianese, Gwen M. Chianese and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.11 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 2.01 ACRES, TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR 1.15 ACRES, IN NEW MILFORD TOWNSHIP, SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 110.001, et al
as 3:2014cv02442
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.11 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 2.01 ACRES, TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR 1.15 ACRES, IN NEW MILFORD TOWNSHIP, SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 110.001, BLUESTONE PIPELINE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC CIO CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 116 PINE STREET, SUITE 320 HARRISBURG, PAl 7101, SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY CIO CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 116 PINE STREET, SUITE 320 HARRISBURG, PA 17101 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.21 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 1.62 ACRES, IN NEW MILFORD TOWNSHIP, SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 127.00-1,042.00,000 et al
as 3:2014cv02452
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.21 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 1.62 ACRES, IN NEW MILFORD TOWNSHIP, SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 127.00-1,042.00,000, MARY E. SNYDER 117 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUSQUEHANNA, PA 18847, SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 116 PINE STREET, SUITE 320 HARRISBURG, PA 17101 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Brenda Schwartz v. Accuratus Corp
as 14-4002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA ANN SCHWARTZ and PAUL GRANT SCHWARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ACCURATUS CORP, In Its Own Right And As Successor In Interest to Accuratus Ceramic Corporation and MATERION BRUSH INC, C/O CT Corporation System
FESTA et al v. WORTHINGTON PUMPS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06138
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. FESTA and PATRICIA FESTA
Defendant:
WORTHINGTON PUMPS, INC., WARREN PUMPS, INC., SQUARE D COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MIRARCHI v. MANGAN et al
as 2:2012cv05749
Plaintiff:
RAFAELLE MIRARCHI
Defendant:
BERNADETTE MANGAN, RN , GLENN PELLETIER, MD, ALEXIS PERRI, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1101 Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986
STANQUITS v. BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37956
Plaintiff:
JACK J. STANQUITS
Defendant:
BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY , CLEVELAND CLIFFS IRON COMPANY, COLUMBIA STEAMSHIP COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
CT CORPORATION, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY and others
Counter_defendant:
USX CORP
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION , HANNA MINING CO , OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
v. SCHIFFER et al
as 2:2010cv68592
Defendant:
STEPHANIE SCHIFFER , MARTIN SCHIFFER , NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEVLIN v. TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00817
Plaintiff:
DIANE DEVLIN
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING, CALIFORNIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Piazza v. CT Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01087
Plaintiff:
Richard Piazza
Defendant:
CT Corporation and Pennsylvania State Police Division of Gaming Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
