Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Sloan v. Chambers et al
as 3:2012cv01954
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
Christopher Chambers, Shellenberger, Ellenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Illes, Sr. v. Beard et al
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Illes, Sr., M.D.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D. , Dorina Varner , Ian Taggart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Southers et al
as 1:2012cv00371
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Houston
Defendant:
Richard Southers and John Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfonso Pew v. John Wetzel, et al
as 11-4531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW, a/k/a Sehu-Kessa-Saa Tabansi
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY SMEAL, JOHN MURRAY, Deputy Secretary Central Region and others
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv01982
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv04635
Petitioner:
JERMAINE JACKSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN MURRAY, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Heim v. McVey et al
as 3:2011cv01285
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, John Wetzell, Shirley Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloan v. Murray et al
as 3:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
John Murray, Ian Taggart, H Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPARD v. MURRAY et al
as 5:2011cv02564
Petitioner:
WALDO V. SHEPARD
Respondent:
JOHN MURRAY, LANCASTER CO. COMMONWEALTH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AYERS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2011cv02396
Petitioner:
CLAYTON J. AYERS, III
Respondent:
JOHN MURRAY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
