Cases 21 - 30 of 40
LENNON et al v. SMEAL et al
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
AARON JASON LENNON and TAXPAYERS, DISABILITY & S.S.I.'S
Defendant:
P.K. SMEAL, J.G. ECHART, F.R. ROYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2010cv04165
Plaintiff:
HIREN PATEL
Defendant:
SHARON K. SMITH, NICOLE JOHNSON and SJ SUBS LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Diaz v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv01659
Plaintiff:
John Diaz
Defendant:
K. Smith, D Sullivan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72648
Plaintiff:
TONEY K. SMITH
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. Kuhn et al
as 1:2010cv01260
Plaintiff:
George Rivera
Defendant:
D.A. Kuhn, F.R. Royer, R.L. Heaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38082
Plaintiff:
ROGER K. SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv67322
Plaintiff:
HELEN K. SMITH
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63735
Plaintiff:
HELEN K. SMITH and NA SMITH
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34134
Plaintiff:
TONEY K. SMITH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv93333
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SMITH and BRENDA K. SMITH
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION , ALBANY INTERNATIONAL , ALLIED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
