Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00049
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01104
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SOMERS et al
as 2:2010cv06380
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO L. RODRIGUEZ and BRUNILDA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KYLE E. SOMERS, WERNER ENTERPRISES , ABC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RODRIGUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57298
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RODRIGUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53526
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2010cv38536
Defendant:
NOE L RODRIGUEZ , A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
ALABAMA D.D. & S.B. CO., C.E. THURSTON & SONS, INC., TODD SHIPYARDS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RODRIGUEZ v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33835
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RODRIGUEZ v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33838
Plaintiff:
PEDRO L. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RODRIGUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30313
Plaintiff:
SEVERO L. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
ARUANNO v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2009cv03368
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant:
STEVE JOHNSON, GEORGE HAYMAN, PAUL LAGANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
