Cases 21 - 30 of 43
MEIJER, INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv04537
Plaintiff:
MEIJER, INC. and MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC.
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MEIJER, INC. et al v. WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv04107
Plaintiff:
MEIJER, INC. and MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Defendant:
WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT US, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv03824
Plaintiff:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. , MEIJER, INC. and others
Defendant:
WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY , WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC , WARNER CHILCOTT US, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MEIJER INC. et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01218
Plaintiff:
MEIJER INC. and MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MEIJER, INC. et al v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
MEIJER, INC. and MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Defendant:
MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. and KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MEIJER, INC. et al v. WYETH, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv07504
Plaintiff:
MEIJER, INC. and MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Defendant:
WYETH, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
ROCHESTER CRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. et al v. BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
as 3:2011cv01524
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. , LOUISIANA DRUG WHOLESALE CO., INC. , MEIJER INC. and others
Respondent:
KREMERS URBAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
