Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
GEGENHEIMER v. PENN-PATRIOT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv06870
Plaintiff: PHILIP GEGENHEIMER, JR.
Defendant: PENN-PATRIOT INSURANCE COMPANY , TEMPLE HOUSING ALTERNATIVES, L.P., TEMPLE HOUSING ALTERNATIVES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
KEELING v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv06764
Petitioner: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
KEELING v. KELLY
as 2:2012cv02720
Plaintiff: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant: LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEMASTER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv02464
Plaintiff: FRANK LEMASTER , MICHAEL EVANS and REGINALD WILKES
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
In re: Michael Keeling
as 12-1030
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
KEELING v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv05304
Petitioner: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keeling v. Damiter, et al
as 11-3002
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant - Appellee: PETE DAMITER, Corr/Supt/Assistance SCI Frackville, C/O GUARD SMITHROVICH, MIRANDA and others
Keeling v. Kloptoski
as 11-2646
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL KLOPTOSKI
KEELING v. KLOPTOSKI
as 2:2009cv04015
Petitioner: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Respondent: MICHAEL KLOPTOSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Keeling v. Damiter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00147
Plaintiff: Michael Evan Keeling
Defendant: Pete Damiter, Smithrovich, Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?