Cases 21 - 30 of 282
FRANK S. LA FAUCI et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv66336
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, CARRIER CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK S. LA FAUCI and LUCILLE LA FAUCI
Cross Defendant:
ELECTRIC SWITCHBOARD CO.,INC., ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Respondent:
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. and AT&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YOUNG v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67757
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chroniger et al v. ABB, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
James R. Chroniger and Darlene Chroniger
Defendant:
ABB, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Siemens Industry, Inc. , Flowserve US, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HERMAN et al v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01602
Plaintiff:
MAYNARD HERMAN and IRENE S. HERMAN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC. , CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS, INC. , THE BUDD COMPANY, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
AMETEK, INC. , CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION , CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIGAS v. BOUNCIR, et al
as 2:2017cv01653
Plaintiff:
JAKUB LIGAS
Defendant:
SATIHA BOUNCIR, ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL, ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOLICK et al v. CBS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv00977
Plaintiff:
LEON BOLICK and MARGARET BOLICK
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION , UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. and others
Cross_claimant:
BOEING COMPANY , GOODRICH CORPORATION , HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
CBS CORPORATION and THE GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tibbets v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Tibbets
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill Co., BW/IP Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Corporation, The Marley-Wylain Company, Pfizer Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. v. RADWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 1:2015cv05246
Plaintiff:
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.
Defendant:
RADWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
