Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hanover Township, Pennsylvania v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv01055
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Indivior, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hanover Township, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Lycoming v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv01039
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Indivior, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Lycoming
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv13684
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright Township, Pennsylvania v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00963
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Indivior, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wright Township, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Northumberland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00945
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Indivior, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
County of Northumberland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv01018
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, RICHARD S. SACKLER, PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Shire Development LLC et al v. SpecGx LLC
as 1:2018cv00800
Plaintiff:
Shire Development LLC , Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Defendant:
SpecGx LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shire Development LLC et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01696
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC, Shire US Inc. and Shire Development LLC
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industires Limited, Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticlas USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
