Cases 21 - 30 of 58
ELOHIM EPF USA, INC. v. HEALING KARAOKE, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08329
Defendant:
SUNG HONG, DAEBAK K-1, INC., CHONG M. YI and others
Plaintiff:
ELOHIM EPF USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HAN v. SS SMILE LIMO, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv15365
Defendant:
HANMAEUM LIMO, LLC, KIL WOO KIM, SUNG JUN PARK and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
QINGDAO FREEDE TRADING CO., LTD v. BAIK KWANG CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv10251
Plaintiff:
QINGDAO FREEDE TRADING CO., LTD
Defendant:
BAIK KWANG CORP., CITY HUNTER INC. and SUNG Y PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
SUNG v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv11960
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, WEST NEW YORK POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SUNG v. VILLAGE SUPER MARKET OF NJ, LP et al
as 2:2017cv05033
Plaintiff:
JUNG-HUA SUNG
Defendant:
VILLAGE SUPER MARKET OF NJ, LP , VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC. , TOM DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PARK v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03155
Plaintiff:
SUNG PARK
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIM v. SGD DUBU LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01447
Plaintiff:
HWAN SUNG KIM and Jin Yong Shin
Defendant:
SGD DUBU LLC and JONG MIN NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHIN v. DONG HEA RESTAURANT (USA) CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
JIN YONG SHIN
Defendant:
DONG HEA RESTAURANT (USA) CORP., SUNG M. PARK, KANG WON LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NAM v. NELKE
as 3:2016cv08632
Plaintiff:
SUNG BOK NAM
Defendant:
MARK D. NELKE, D.M.D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04353
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
