Cases 21 - 30 of 174
James Bryant v. Karen Kaskie, et al
as 18-2195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN KASKIE and VINCENT MOONEY
Dacenzo v. Mooney et al
as 3:2018cv00892
Petitioner:
Frederico A. Dacenzo, Jr.
Respondent:
Vincent Mooney and Josh Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AVERGUN v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2018cv01708
Petitioner:
JOSEF AVERGUN
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCPHERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY et al
as 5:2018cv01689
Petitioner:
BRANDON L. MCPHERSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Snider v. McKeehan et al
as 4:2018cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
McKeehan, Nichtman, Jennifer Herrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parchinski v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Parchinski
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Vincent Mooney , Robert McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Mooney et al
as 4:2017cv02342
Plaintiff:
Easkon Walker
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, S. Miller and Lisa Bolka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Bailey v. Renee Foulds, et al
as 17-2844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
RENEE FOULDS, BRAD RITCHEY, HOPWOOD, CO and others
Bailey v. Foulds et al
as 3:2017cv01166
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Renee Foulds, Brad Ritchey, Hopwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAZQUEZ v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2017cv02868
Petitioner:
NELSON VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
