Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Bowman v. Graen et al
as 1:2017cv01709
Plaintiff:
Sabirah Bowman
Defendant:
Jay Graen and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. GRAEN et al
as 1:2017cv01491
Plaintiff:
Lorenda Hill
Defendant:
Jay W. Graen and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. GRAEN et al
as 2:2017cv02143
Plaintiff:
LORENDA HILL
Defendant:
JAY W. GRAEN and WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barry v. Wheeler et al
as 4:2016cv02248
Plaintiff:
James D. Barry
Defendant:
Phillip M. Wheeler, Werner Enterprises, Inc., Francisco Suero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JANKOVIC v. HIRT et al
as 3:2016cv05467
Plaintiff:
NIKOLA JANKOVIC
Defendant:
LEWIS HIRT , MUSHROOM CANNING CO. , DARIUS SMITH and others
Cross_claimant:
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC. , DARIUS SMITH , JOHN JOHNSON and others
Cross_defendant:
ABC PARTNERSHIPS, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. , LEWIS HIRT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CHENG v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2016cv04036
Plaintiff:
HAU CHENG
Defendant:
JOSEPH WILLIAMS and WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMILLERI v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03897
Plaintiff:
DINAH M. CAMILLERI
Defendant:
WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., MICHAEL G. BAILEY, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
THOMPSON v. BERGMAN et al
as 3:2015cv06192
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. THOMPSON
Defendant:
SCOTT R. BERGMAN , WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. , JOHN DOES (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
