Cases 31 - 40 of 64
FOX v. KUCHER et al
as 2:2014cv06212
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FOX
Defendant:
MAY KUCHER , ALISON SMITH and TULLYTOWN BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06175
Plaintiff:
EDNA JONES
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , BAYVIEW ASSOCIATES , SANFORD SANDELMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DADUS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05859
Plaintiff:
AUDIE DADUS , MAXINE DAVIS , THEODORA DELCO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05639
Plaintiff:
ALISON COULL REED
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and EASTERN ACCOUNT SYSTEM OF CONNECTICUT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCDONALD v. MAG ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 2:2013cv04458
Plaintiff:
ALISON MCDONALD
Defendant:
MAG ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
REIGH v. RENEAU et al
as 2:2013cv03992
Plaintiff:
ALISON M. REIGH
Defendant:
HANNAH F. RENEAU and RUSSELL K. RENEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SHEBEST v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv01904
Plaintiff:
ALISON SHEBEST
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THOMAS LICIARDELLO , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
