Cases 31 - 40 of 67
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv04547
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ and JESSIE INEZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONS OFFICER MCGEE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BALTIMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2018cv04755
Petitioner:
RONALD LONG
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv04260
Petitioner:
JULIUS DAVIS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GEORGE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv01201
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ROBINSON
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOODS v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2018cv02512
Petitioner:
JAMES WOODS
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTINEZ v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv01493
Petitioner:
JOHN MARTINEZ
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANAMAN v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VANAMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, GANJI, VALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv00686
Petitioner:
VERNON JOHNSON
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYES v. SGT. WILKENS et al
as 2:2017cv13182
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM MAURICE HAYES
Defendant:
SGT. WILKENS, GEORGE ROBINSON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULERO v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2017cv11913
Petitioner:
JULIO MULERO
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
