Cases 31 - 40 of 43
SATTAZAHN v. DUNHAM et al
as 5:2012cv02148
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN SATTAZAHN
Defendant:
ROB DUNHAM, SAM ANGELL, ABBY RIGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv01179
Petitioner:
SYLVESTER SMITH
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Petitioner:
JULIUS J. CLARK
Respondent:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRICE v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2012cv00654
Petitioner:
CURTIS PRICE
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADLEPHIA, CO., SECRETARY AND BOARD OF AND PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv00621
Petitioner:
JAMES JONES
Respondent:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REEVES v. HARLOW et al
as 3:2011cv00248
Petitioner:
ROBERT REEVES
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CREDICO v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2011cv06439
Petitioner:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Respondent:
EDWARD MCFADDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER (JOSEPH CARROLL) and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (LINDA KELLY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rock v. Asure et al
as 1:2011cv01839
Plaintiff:
William Rock
Defendant:
Donna Asure, Gary McFarland, Susan McCool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenteen v. White et al
as 3:2011cv01540
Petitioner:
Michael Valenteen
Respondent:
Lori White, Wayne Gavin, John Wetzell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Essence v. Wenerowicz et al
as 3:2011cv01340
Petitioner:
Bleek Essence
Respondent:
Mike Wenerowicz and Linda Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
