Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00687
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. , The P.F. Laboratories Inc. and others
Defendant:
Alvogen Pine Brook Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Alvogen Pine Brook Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Grunenthal GMBH , Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. , The P.F. Laboratories Inc. and others
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Purdue Pharma LP et al v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc.
as 1:2015cv00260
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma LP , P.F. Laboratories Inc. , Purdue Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Defendant:
Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DEPOMED, INC. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 3:2013cv00571
Plaintiff:
DEPOMED, INC.
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. , THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC. , PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al v. VARAM, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01898
Plaintiff:
PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. , THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC. , PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P. and others
Defendant:
VARAM, INC. and KVK-TECH, INC.
Counter_claimant:
VARAM, INC.
Counter_defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. , PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P. , RHODES TECHNOLOGIES and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al v. VARAM, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04028
Plaintiff:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. , THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC. , PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P. and others
Defendant:
VARAM, INC. and KVK-TECH, INC.
Counter_claimant:
VARAM, INC.
Counter_defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. , PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P. , RHODES TECHNOLOGIES and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.