Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Cox v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01246
Defendant:
Wendy Yarno, Lowell W. Robinson, Irvine O. Hockaday, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Cox
RAINES v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv14597
Plaintiff:
JEAN RAINES
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobson v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01200
Defendant:
Lowell W. Robinson, Irvine O. Hockaday, Jr., Craig A. Barbarosh and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jacobson
Wolfe v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01125
Defendant:
Lowell W. Robinson, Irvine O. Hockaday, Jr., Craig A. Barbarosh and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Wolfe
Cooper v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01116
Defendant:
Wendy Yarno, Lowell W. Robinson, John W. Vander Vort, J.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Cooper
Wohletz v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01050
Defendant:
Wendy Yarno, Lowell W. Robinson, Irvine O. Hockaday, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Bernhard Wohletz
Wang v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Wendy Yarno, Lowell W. Robinson, John W. Vander Vort, J.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Rosenblatt v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01030
Defendant:
Wendy Yarno, Lowell W. Robinson, Irvine O. Hockaday, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Miller v. Borger et al
as 3:2019cv00101
Defendant:
C.O. Fritzinger, C.O. Borger, R.N. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan E Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAIN COMPUTING, INC. v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. et al
as 2:2018cv17573
Plaintiff:
RAIN COMPUTING, INC.
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS INC., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. and LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
