Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07279
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06974
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PHILLIPS v. SUNOCO, INC.
as 2:2010cv04931
Plaintiff: EDWARD PHILLIPS
Defendant: SUNOCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04599
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MILLER v. QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79206
Plaintiff: LOUIS PAUL MILLER
Defendant: QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPENCER v. SUNOCO, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN et al
as 2:2010cv04420
Plaintiff: DAVID J. SPENCER
Defendant: SUNOCO, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN and JOHN F. CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CORAOPOLIS WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY v. ASHLAND, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04192
Plaintiff: CORAOPOLIS WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY
Defendant: ASHLAND, INC.
Movant: SUNOCO, INC. (R&M) and SUNOCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2923
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02559
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RIPLEY et al v. SUNOCO, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01194
Plaintiff: MATTHEW RIPLEY , JAMES P. SAVAGE, JR. , BRADFORD TAKACS and others
Defendant: SUNOCO, INC. , MICHAEL G. MCKEE and STEPHEN J. KOCZIRKA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?