Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Nesbit v. Glunt et al
as 3:2012cv00977
Petitioner:
Daron Nesbit
Respondent:
Steven R. Glunt , PA State Attorney General and York County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seabolt v. Collins
as 3:2012cv00780
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Seabolt
Defendant:
Robert Collins and PA Attorney General Office
Respondent:
York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gellispie v. Coleman et al
as 1:2012cv00187
Petitioner:
Troy Jamell Gellispie
Respondent:
Brian Coleman , PA State Attorney General and York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. Sauers
as 3:2011cv01661
Respondent:
Sauers and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Saul Ortiz, Jr.
Amicu:
York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01570
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boanes v. Lamas et al
as 1:2011cv00169
Petitioner:
Marty Boanes, Jr.
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas, PA Attorney General and York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KOHLER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv04748
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CLARK KOHLER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, YORK HOSPITAL, WELLSPAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades v. Sabol et al
as 4:2009cv01567
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Rhoades, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, York County District Attorney's Office, York County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Cameron et al
as 3:2009cv01178
Petitioner:
Michael Douglas Patton
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron, York County District Attorney and Tom Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
