Cases 41 - 50 of 740,474
H. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv02646
Plaintiff:
S. H.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Deputy Warden PIERRE LACOMBE, Prison Commissioner BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SOCOLOVSKY v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
CHASE SOCOLOVSKY
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, ROSEANNA MELLE-GREEN, JAHIYA GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WEINGRAD v. RFR CAPITAL LLC
as 2:2024cv02636
Plaintiff:
LEON WEINGRAD
Defendant:
RFR CAPITAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MELTON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02641
Plaintiff:
MICHELE ANNE MELTON
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
STATEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02655
Plaintiff:
DERRICK V. STATEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
