Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv06551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv06550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv06548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv05740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451
MY CANARY LLC et al v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY et al
as 3:2014cv05030
Plaintiff:
MY CANARY LLC , RICHARD BODEE and CHICAGO AVIATION, INC.
Defendant:
CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY , TEXTRON AVIATION , SUSIEAIR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Terry et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2014cv04306
Plaintiff:
Joseph Terry , Robert Bender , Daniel R Estrada, Sr. and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-SYNTHELABO INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ACEVEDO et al v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ACEVEDO , DAWON BALDWIN and TORELL MILLER
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JULIO GALINDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv07882
Plaintiff:
Mary Mathis , Jose Paris , Russell Alexander and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
