Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Biggins v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Christopher Klien, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00366
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Joseph F. Biden, III and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Biggins v. Gile et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
George Gile, Mark D. Daum, Marcili Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
James Biggins v. Perry Phelps, Warden, et al
as 10-4221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF DE, ATTY GEN DE and PERRY PHELPS, Warden
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00732
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas L. Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2010cv00724
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
State of Delaware, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 10-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, RICK KEARNEY, MIKE COSTELLO and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. LITTLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
