Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
SOFTMART, INC. et al v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv02287
Plaintiff: SOFTMART, INC. , SOFTMART COMMERICAL SERVICES, INC. and SOFTMART MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CATANIA et al
as 2:2013cv01045
Plaintiff: TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: FRANK CATANIA and CATANIA ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Type: Contract › Insurance
BRANCIFORTE v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv00741
Plaintiff: ROSEANNE BRANCIFORTE
Defendant: TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract › Insurance
ETTINGER & ASSOCIATES, LLC et al v. THE HARTFORD/TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv03274
Plaintiff: ETTINGER & ASSOCIATES, LLC and NEIL D. ETTINGER
Defendant: THE HARTFORD/TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
PARKER MCCAY, P.A. v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02971
Plaintiff: PARKER MCCAY, P.A.
Defendant: HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract › Insurance
CHAUNHENG MANAGEMENT et al v. THE HARTFORD'S TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv06319
Plaintiff: CHAUNHENG MANAGEMENT and DAVID MOLONY
Defendant: THE HARTFORD'S TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract › Insurance
PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04647
Plaintiff: PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and PNY TECHNOLOGIES EUROPE
Defendant: TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract › Insurance
FEDERATED INVESTORS, INC. et al v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv00775
Plaintiff: FEDERATED INVESTORS, INC. , FEDERATED EQUITY MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA , FEDERATED INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY and others
Defendant: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_claimant: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant: FEDERATED EQUITY MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA , FEDERATED GLOBAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION , FEDERATED INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Type: Contract › Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00199
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy › Appeal
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al v. ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00247
Plaintiff: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION
Defendant: ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY , THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant: MUNICH REINSURANCE AMERICA, INC, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, STRONGHOLD INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: HOWDEN NORTH AMERICAN, INC , FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY , TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Counter_claimant: HOWDEN NORTH AMERICAN, INC , FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY , TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Counter_defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract › Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?