Cases 41 - 50 of 67
WATT-MORSE v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2012cv01086
Plaintiff:
MARGARET WATT-MORSE
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
AUERON, M.D. v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2012cv01318
Plaintiff:
FRED AUERON, M.D.
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
JOHNSON v. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASSEL v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 5:2011cv07909
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. CASSEL
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEBOON v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2011cv07069
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEE LEBOON
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HAKIM v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2011cv01265
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HAKIM
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANDER-LEEUW v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv05685
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VANDER-LEEUW
Defendant:
FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , UNUM PROVIDENT, UNUM GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MAHONEY v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv04149
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. MAHONEY
Defendant:
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNUM GROUP and PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABERNOVICH v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv03527
Plaintiff:
GEMMA L. ABERNOVICH
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, UNUM GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HARDING v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
THERESA HARDING
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
