Cases 51 - 60 of 92
LARSEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36035
Plaintiff:
LEO P. LARSEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
United Access Technologies LLC v. CenturyTel Broadband Services LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
United Access Technologies LLC
Defendant:
CenturyLink Inc., Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, Centel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LARSEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01445
Plaintiff:
JANICE LARSEN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOSS v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
DARNELL DOSS
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, JOHN BURKHART, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LARSEN et al v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2010cv57542
Plaintiff:
CHRIS F. LARSEN and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LARSEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57388
Plaintiff:
ORSON B. LARSEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LARSEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57622
Plaintiff:
NORMAN B. LARSEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LARSEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53174
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. LARSEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LARSEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53321
Plaintiff:
STEVEN K. LARSEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LARSEN et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv81968
Plaintiff:
WALDO W. LARSEN and MARIAN I. LARSEN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORP. , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
