Cases 51 - 60 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv05323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MENDEZ v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE et al
as 2:2014cv05287
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MENDEZ
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, E. NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COIT v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 2:2014cv05168
Plaintiff:
ERIC COIT
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., ASIF S. HUSSAIN, ABC CORP 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COPELAND v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT et al
as 2:2014cv04433
Plaintiff:
LORENZO COPELAND
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. DEMPSEY et al
as 2:2014cv03673
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIA SAVAGE
Defendant:
RODNEY DEMPSEY, JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERRELOUIS v. SANCHEZ et al
as 2:2014cv01940
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRELOUIS
Defendant:
DAVID SANCHEZ , PV HOLDING CORP., JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ISOM v. COHEN et al
as 2:2014cv01344
Plaintiff:
GAIL ISOM
Defendant:
ISAAC COHEN, ALBERT COHEN, JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WENDELL v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv06903
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WENDELL
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYERS et al v. ATLANTA MARRIOTT HOTEL et al
as 2:2013cv06824
Plaintiff:
KIANA MAYERS and SHANA KING
Defendant:
ATLANTA MARRIOTT HOTEL, JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC CORP 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ISLER v. PERSAUD et al
as 2:2013cv06534
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANN ISLER
Defendant:
SOOKDEO PERSAUD, JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
