Cases 51 - 60 of 315
Be Labs, Inc. v. Karma Mobility Inc.
as 1:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Be Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Karma Mobility Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BoardActive Corporation v. Foursquare Labs, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
BoardActive Corporation
Defendant:
Foursquare Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Backertop Licensing LLC v. Wyze Labs, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Backertop Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Wyze Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
DIGITAL DREAM LABS, INC v. LIVING TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD
as 2:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL DREAM LABS, INC
Defendant:
LIVING TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD doing business as LIVING.AI and EMO PET
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
JUUL LABS, INC. v. MONTVALE SNACK SHOP, INC.
as 2:2022cv02026
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant:
MONTVALE SNACK SHOP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Waverly Licensing LLC v. Granite River Labs Inc.
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Waverly Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Granite River Labs Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC v. YIM et al
as 2:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC
Defendant:
BYUNG CHAN YIM, HYO SUN KIM, ASSURED COMPONENTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ProPhase Labs, Inc. v. Predictive Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
ProPhase Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Predictive Laboratories, Inc. and Predictive Technology Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Heritage IP LLC v. XY Labs, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01838
Plaintiff:
Heritage IP LLC
Defendant:
XY Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Wyze Labs, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01704
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Wyze Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
