Cases 61 - 66 of 66
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, DISTRICT 1199P v. MONSOUR MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01151
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, DISTRICT 1199P
Defendant:
MONSOUR MEDICAL CENTER, INC., PHYSICIANS SERVICES, INC., WESTMORELAND PRIORITY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, DISTRICT 1199P v. CHARLES MORRIS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
as 2:2007cv01144
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, DISTRICT 1199P
Defendant:
CHARLES MORRIS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VEATCH, et.al. v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, et.al.
as 2:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
REGIS G. VEATCH and MARILYN S. VEATCH
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 32BJ v. SCOTLANDYARD SECURITY SERVICE LTD.
as 2:2007cv00398
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 32BJ and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 32BJ
Defendant:
SCOTLANDYARD SECURITY SERVICE LTD.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ et al v. PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES
as 2:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ BUILDING OPERATORS WELFARE TRUST FUND, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ BUILDING OPERATORS PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant:
PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
