Cases 61 - 70 of 2,145
FWK HOLDINGS, LLC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02958
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02960
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Interested Party:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bayer Pharma AG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer AG and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HAUGHTON v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv03646
Plaintiff:
OCIE MAE HAUGHTON
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, ARROW PHARM (MALTA) LTD. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FANNING v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
LINDA FANNING
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, AUROLIFE PHARMA, LLC and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MUSSORICI v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02880
Plaintiff:
DIANE MUSSORICI
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., f/k/a Ortho-McNeil Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical Inc. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
O'NEAL v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02882
Plaintiff:
JULIA O'NEAL
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., f/k/a Ortho-McNeil Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical Inc. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ESPOSITO v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02878
Plaintiff:
APRIL ESPOSITO
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., f/k/a Ortho-McNeil Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical Inc. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RHODES v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02883
Plaintiff:
JUDITH RHODES
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., f/k/a Ortho-McNeil Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical Inc. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPELMAN v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02886
Plaintiff:
CAROL SPELMAN
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., f/k/a Ortho-McNeil Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical Inc. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
