Cases 71 - 80 of 106
SCHAEFER et al v. C.R.BARD et al
as 2:2019cv14377
Defendant:
C.R.BARD and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCHAEFER and GLORIA SCHAEFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAHL et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17057
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
LISA M. BAHL and TIMOTHY M. BAHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLAYTON v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17059
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, BARD PERIPHERAL VASULAR, INC. (a subsdiary and/or division of defendant C.R. BARD, INC.), C. R. BARD, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN D. CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05482
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC. and C.R. BARD INC.
Plaintiff:
CODY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENSBY v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05484
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC. and C.R. BARD INC.
Plaintiff:
SARAH OWENSBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERRIHEW v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05483
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC. and C.R. BARD INC.
Plaintiff:
MELODY MERRIHEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EPPS v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv01881
Plaintiff:
KAWANTA DEVON EPPS
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KUNSAK v. KIPROFF, M.D. et al
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
NANCY ELIZABETH KUNSAK
Defendant:
PAUL M. KIPROFF, M.D., RAYMOND L. BENZA, M.D., ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DONIGAN v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv04889
Plaintiff:
DONIGAN and MICHAEL A. DONIGAN
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC, BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPENCER v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02573
Plaintiff:
PAMELA SPENCER
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
