Cases 71 - 80 of 259
Chambers v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv02081
Respondent:
Warden David J. Ebbert
Petitioner:
Roscoe Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chambers v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv02300
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis-El v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2018cv02207
Defendant:
B. Chambers, A Cotterall, Brent Tharp and others
Plaintiff:
Raheem Louis-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chambers v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2018cv01207
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, J. Stouds, B. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chambers v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2018cv01009
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, M.D. Carvajol, Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RPM INDUSTRIES, LLC et al v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA et al
as 2:2018cv00517
Plaintiff:
RPM INDUSTRIES, LLC and RPM REALTY, LLC
Defendant:
AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA and CHAMBERS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Moneyham v. Chambers
as 3:2018cv00513
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moneyham
Defendant:
B. Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2018cv00501
Petitioner:
Roscoe Chambers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chambers et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
William A Chambers , Joseph A Chambers , Jeanne C Faux and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC and Statoil USA Onshore Properties Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC. v. MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00740
Plaintiff:
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC , APPLEWOOD POST ACUTE, LLC , BAY VIEW REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
