Cases 71 - 80 of 16,786
Mines et al v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ulysses G. Mines, Jr. and Florence Mines
Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , A. O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Agan v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00741
Plaintiff:
W.H. Agan
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc., Allegheny Teledyne Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc. , SB Decking Inc. , Parker-Hannifan Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bishop v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Bishop
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. , Clayton Industries, Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Clayton Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PRIEST et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD.
as 2:2014cv02697
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Arbitrator:
MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI
Cross Defendant:
LEON C. PRIEST, SHARON M. PRIEST and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 26-50 (fictitious)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Malone et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Ingersoll Rand Company, Trane US Inc., Hopeman Brothers Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Riley Power Inc., FMC Corporation, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PEMBERTON v. JOHN CRANE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. PEMBERTON
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE, INC., THE DREVER GROUP , DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
THE DREVER GROUP
Cross_defendant:
THE DREVER GROUP , DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MCCOURT et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al
as 2:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCCOURT and MABEL MCCOURT
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA , BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PFIZER, INC. , A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dougherty et al v. A O Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01972
Plaintiff:
Francis J. Dougherty and Elizabeth F. Dougherty
Defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane Inc.
Cross_defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
