Cases 71 - 80 of 248
GIBSON v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 3:2020cv15052
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MEREDITH GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COPPOLA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.,
as 2:2020cv13988
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY COPPOLA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GREAVES v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
as 2:2020cv12795
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
Plaintiff:
KYLE GREAVES
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SOLOMON v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv10356
Defendant:
INTERSTATE HOTELS CONSULTING GROUP, INC., HOTEL PENNSYLVANIA MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC and NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROGER SOLOMON
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
WHEATON v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2020cv03222
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WHEATON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SONNENBERG v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 3:2020cv02872
Plaintiff:
SONNENBERG and THOMAS SONNENBERG
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
FERNANDES v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2020cv03810
Plaintiff:
NARCISO FERNANDES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ALI v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
as 2:2020cv03685
Plaintiff:
RAHIM ALI
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BENTIVEGNA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2019mc00184
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENTIVEGNA
THIELFOLDT v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2019cv03499
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
JESSICA THIELFOLDT
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
