Cases 71 - 80 of 129
TAILEY v. MARTINEZ
as 3:2010cv01437
Petitioner:
Kulee Tailey
Respondent:
R. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. MARTINEZ et al
as 5:2010cv03273
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JACK YOUNG
Defendant:
R. MARTINEZ, KEVIN PIGOS, JODY BENNETT-MEEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Kaminski et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv01276
Plaintiff:
David James Ward
Defendant:
J. Kaminski, F Passaniti and R Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ward v. Martinez
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv01228
Petitioner:
David James Ward
Respondent:
R Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Martinez
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv01217
Petitioner:
Corey Thomas
Respondent:
R. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyers v. Martinez
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv01151
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
R. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TAILEY v. MARTINEZ
as 2:2010cv02603
Petitioner:
KULEE TAILEY
Respondent:
R. MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woodruff v. Martinez
as 3:2010cv00798
Petitioner:
Kevin-Paul Woodruff
Respondent:
R Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEYERS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2010cv01607
Petitioner:
DAVID MEYERS
Respondent:
R. MARTINEZ, U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE and OLIVIA HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTINEZ v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33067
Plaintiff:
THEODORE R. MARTINEZ and THEODORE R. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.