Cases 71 - 80 of 80
ADAIR v. PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP et al
as 2:2010cv00798
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ADAIR
Defendant:
PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP and THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BRYER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2009cv01869
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR GARY BRYER
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ELKADRAWY v. THE VANGUARD GROUP INC.
as 2:2008cv02056
Plaintiff:
EMAD ELKADRAWY
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VERNER v. RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICAN, L.P (RANDSTAD) et al
as 2:2008cv00662
Plaintiff:
MONICA VERNER
Defendant:
RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICAN, L.P (RANDSTAD), THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC. (VANGUARD), DREW LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
TRAVIS v. THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03484
Plaintiff:
JOY TRAVIS
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC. and VANGUARD MARKETING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
