Cases 1 - 10 of 18
CAPPEL v. COUNTY OF ESSEX, et al.
as 2:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAPPEL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ARMANDO B. FONTOURA, JAMES SPANGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv20587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv16140
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRUNSON v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv04577
Plaintiff:
CHIFFONE BRUNSON
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CITY OF EAST ORANGE, EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAIR v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv03683
Plaintiff:
CARLENE BLAIR
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DUNS: 60-2158974 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ENGLISH et al v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2017cv03646
Plaintiff:
ANITA J ENGLISH and ROBERT A ENGLISH
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, KESSLER LAW LLC, OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
OTTO v. JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv03424
Plaintiff:
DENISE OTTO
Defendant:
JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF NJ, THE OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARINO v. FONTOURA
as 2:2016mc00272
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA O. CARINO
Defendant:
ARMANDO B. FONTOURA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
