Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Nash et al v. Litz et al
as 3:2026cv02076
Plaintiff:
Angel Anthony Nash and Juan Se Pagan-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tina Litz, Rebecca Davis, Heather Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. The Guardian
as 2:2026cv01582
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Anthony
Defendant:
The Guardian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv09292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gibbs v. Siranides et al
as 1:2026cv00896
Plaintiff:
Hertford Gibbs
Defendant:
Officer Jake Siranides, Officer Tyler Clendaniel, Officer Jeremiah Purnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALE et al v. MCNALLY
as 2:2026mc00063
Respondent:
EDWARD E MCNALLY
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DALE, JOHNNA FOX, BENJAMIN BORROWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Robinson v. O'Donnell et al
as 4:2026cv02032
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Robinson
Defendant:
Michael O'Donnell, Kevin O'Hearn, Judge Rosini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FIORANI v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS et al
as 3:2026cv09063
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FIORANI
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, COMMUNITY OPTIONS CORPORATION and NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALLGREN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE
as 2:2026cv05095
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BRIAN MALLGREN
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv01539
Plaintiff:
Anthony Douglas
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
