Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FOWLER et al v. BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2024cv00133
Defendant:
BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPANY, LLC formerly known as GO FINANCIAL doing business as GO FINANCIAL and GO FINANCIAL
Plaintiff:
SEAN FOWLER and ALISA FRIERSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1667 Consumer Leasing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HARVIN et al v. CARVANA LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
SYRETTA ANGELIQUE HARVIN, DAVID WEAVER, JR, JOSEPH A RIEDEL and others
Defendant:
CARVANA LLC, BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPANY LLC, ALLY BANK and others
CAUGHEY v. BRIDGECREST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
MATHEW CAUGHEY
Defendant:
BRIDGECREST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12979
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LYONS v. DRIVETIME CARSALES COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03517
Defendant:
DRIVETIME CARSALES COMPANY, LLC, JON EHRLINGER and BRIDGECREST ACCEPTANCE CORP.
Plaintiff:
JOYCE LYONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
