Cases 1 - 6 of 6
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY v. CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA et al
as 1:2019cv00341
Defendant:
SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., THE WALLINGFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. PYROTEK, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01386
Plaintiff:
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PYROTEK, INC. , IRIS S. BURTON, CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ACE Property & Casualty Insura v. Global Reinsurance Corp of Ame
as 13-2245
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO, as successor in interest to Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, as respects policies issued through Cravens, Dargan & Company, Pacific Coast formerly known as CIGNA Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP OF AMERICA, FKA Constitution Reinsurance Corp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01002
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
SANCHEZ et al v. 1-100 DOES
as 2:2010cv67122
Plaintiff:
KATHY SANCHEZ , MELZINER WORM , BERTIE A. BROWNLOW, JR. and others
Defendant:
1-100 DOES
Thirdparty_defendant:
ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WINTERTHUR, TUREGUM INSURANCE CO., NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
1-100 DOES and AUBURN TECHNOLOGY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. v. CENTRAL NATL INS., et al
as 2:2000cv04763
Defendant:
CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. OF OMAHA, FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Respondent:
CRAVENS, DRAGAN CO, PACIFIC COAST, As Managing General Agent of CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
