Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Berroteran v. CIT Group Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00038
Defendant: Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff: Aaron Berroteran
STRICKLAND v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00696
Defendant: MICHAEL A CARPENTER, WILLIAM M FREEMAN, R BRAD OATES and others
Plaintiff: SHAWN STRICKLAND
KONDER v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2020cv18449
Defendant: DORENE C. DOMINGUEZ, WILLIAM M. FREEMAN, KHANH T. TRAN and others
Plaintiff: ZOLTAN KONDER
Thomas v. CIT Group Inc. et al.
as 1:2020cv01641
Defendant: Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Thomas
RHODA v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2020cv17547
Defendant: DORENE C. DOMINGUEZ, R. BRAD OATES, WILLIAM M. FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff: BRENT RHODA
Ordonez v. CIT Group Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01586
Defendant: Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff: Blake Ordonez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BORGHI et al v. ONEWEST BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2015cv00323
Plaintiff: PAUL BORGHI and BONNIE BORGHI
Defendant: ONEWEST BANK, FSB, INDYMAC BANK, FSB, CIT GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mark Meade v. Kiddie Academy Domestic Franch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK C. MEADE
Defendant - Appellee: KIDDIE ACADEMY DOMESTIC FRANCHISING LLC, CIT GROUP INC, WILLIAM ENDRES and others
Type: Contract Franchise
MEADE v. KIDDIE ACADEMY DOMESTIC FRANCHISING, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04077
Plaintiff: MARK C. MEADE
Defendant: KIDDIE ACADEMY DOMESTIC FRANCHISING, LLC , CIT GROUP INC. , WILLIAM ENDRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?