Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
ROGERS et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv00573
Defendant:
CROWN BOILER, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III and SUSAN M. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
TUCKFELT et al v. CRANE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv60194
Plaintiff:
SONDRA M. TUCKFELT and MARK TUCKFELT
Defendant:
CRANE CO. , A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and CARRIER CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MOSKOWITZ v. CRANE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv60192
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MOSKOWITZ
Defendant:
CRANE CO. , A.O. SMITH WARER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., , A.O. SMITH WARER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
CLYDE UNION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GOTTLIEB et al v. CRANE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv60190
Plaintiff:
ALAN A. GOTTLIEB and WENDY GOTTLIEB
Defendant:
CRANE CO. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Oates et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01229
Plaintiff:
Robert Oates, Sr. and Emmaline Oates
Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Peerless Industries Inc. , Compudyne Corporation , Kentile Floors Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Peerless Industries Inc. , AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HERRICK v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60161
Plaintiff:
ARLEN HERRICK
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , CRANE CO. , AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
CARRIER CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
CARRIER CORPORATION, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKERS v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv67338
Plaintiff:
NANCY R. AKERS
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AESYS TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRESTON v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67339
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRESTON
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. , AMERICAN STANDARD INC. , BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
DANA CORPORATION and RILEY STOKER CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC , NORTON COMPANY , CROWN, CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
DANA CORPORATION and RILEY STOKER CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC , NORTON COMPANY , CROWN, CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ST. LAURENT v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67276
Plaintiff:
RACHEL ST. LAURENT
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. , ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , RILEY STOKER CORP. , PNEUMO-ABEX CORP. and others
Cross_defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND CO. , ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY and others
Counter_claimant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , RILEY STOKER CORP. , PNEUMO-ABEX CORP. and others
Counter_defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND CO. , ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
