Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Delaware Radio Technologies LLC et al v. CC Media Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01815
Plaintiff:
Delaware Radio Technologies LLC and Wyncomm LLC
Defendant:
CC Media Holdings Inc. and Clear Channel Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PARSON et al v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07289
Plaintiff:
TRACEY PARSON and KIDDIE KARE CHILD CARE & EDUCATION CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , CAPSTAR RADIO OPERATING CO. and TARSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AUGINS v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03313
Plaintiff:
HANA AUGINS
Defendant:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., RADIO ONE, INC. and ROBERT LITTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. SOLO NIGHTCLUB, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02380
Plaintiff:
TYHEEM BAKER
Defendant:
SOLO NIGHTCLUB, LLC, JP ENTERTAINMENT LIQUOR, LLC, LLOYD TRAN and others
Cross_claimant:
WUSL POWER 99 and CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
ABC COMPANIES (BEING FICTITIOUS NAMES OF PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SAFTEY AND SECURITY OF SOLO NIGHTCLUB, LLC A/K/A SOLO NIGHTCLUB A/K/A CLUB SOLO, THEIR TRUE NAMES BEING UNKNOWN, ABC COMPANIES 6-10, DWIGHT GRANT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BURCK v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02560
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BURCK
Defendant:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CLEAR CHANNEL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., COREY BONALEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC. et al v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 2:2005cv05414
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC. and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Defendant:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
