Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AMANALIGUI et al v. COTTLE et al
as 2:2022cv04299
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA AMANALIGUI, WILSON BAQUERO and YOLANDA AMUNATIGUI
Defendant:
ROBERT W. COTTLE, MATTHEW HOLLAND, MARK LOSCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COTTLE v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03618
Defendant:
TAKEDA CALIFORNIA, INC., MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP COTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2018cv09507
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC, NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BISHOP, Miguel Flores, EMMA FRANCES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BLOOMFIELD MB IX, LLC v. NEW FRONTIERS MAPLE HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv07245
Plaintiff:
BLOOMFIELD MB IX, LLC
Defendant:
NEW FRONTIERS MAPLE HOLDINGS, LLC, 15 TALBOT STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC, 112 FOREST STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTTLE STRAWBERRY NURSERY, INC. v. FRESH MARKETING, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01196
Plaintiff:
COTTLE STRAWBERRY NURSERY, INC.
Defendant:
FRESH MARKETING, INC., FRESH MARKETING FARMS, LLC, MARIA DONATO and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COTTLE v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
CHARLES COTTLE
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
